Tag Archives: court

Mahindra to contest ‘BE 6e’ Trademark against IndiGo in court, renames electric SUV brand to ‘BE 6’

Mahindra & Mahindra (M&M) has announced its decision to rename its new electric vehicle (EV) brand to ‘BE 6’. This comes amid an ongoing legal battle with InterGlobe Aviation, the owner of IndiGo airlines, over the trademark ‘BE 6e’. Despite the renaming, Mahindra intends to continue contesting IndiGo’s claim in court.

IndiGo, India’s largest domestic airline, has sued Mahindra for using the ‘6E’ branding, which is widely recognized as IndiGo’s call sign. Mahindra argues that the claim is baseless and plans to challenge it vigorously during court proceedings.

“Our priority is ensuring an excellent customer experience as we take our product to the market. We would not like to get distracted from our vision of popularising electric transport in India,” Mahindra stated. The company also expressed disappointment over the conflict, emphasizing that both Indian multinationals should support each other’s growth rather than engage in disputes.

Mahindra has decided to brand its product as “BE 6” to avoid distraction from its core mission. The automaker stressed that IndiGo’s claim, if unchallenged, could set a negative precedent by monopolizing alphanumeric two-character marks, which could restrict other companies across various industries.

The company highlighted past objections from Tata Motors regarding InterGlobe’s use of the IndiGo mark, noting that InterGlobe uses the mark across different industries and businesses. Mahindra unveiled its electric-origin SUVs, the BE 6e and XEV 9e, on November 26, 2024.

Mahindra has applied for trademark registration under class 12 (vehicles) for “BE 6e” and has the “BE” mark registered in the same class, representing its “born electric” platform. The automaker insists that “BE 6e” differs fundamentally from IndiGo’s “6E,” eliminating any risk of confusion due to the distinct industries and styling.

The BE 6e is part of Mahindra’s futuristically designed sports e-SUV lineup, which includes models like BE 5e and BE 7e. Mahindra’s other EV brand, XEV, recently launched the XEV 9e.

Despite the renaming, Mahindra remains committed to contesting IndiGo’s claim and securing its right to the ‘BE 6e’ brand name. The company believes that the dispute should not detract from its mission to advance electric transportation in India.

KL College of Law Concludes National Moot Court, Highlighting India’s Future Legal Leaders

Hyderabad, October 4: The College of Law at KL Deemed to be University successfully conducted the 4th Koneru Laxmaiah Memorial National Moot Court Competition 2024, with participation from 36 teams representing law colleges, law schools, and deemed universities across the country. The prestigious event commenced with the draw of lots, marking the qualification of 16 teams for the Octa-Final rounds. This event was graced by distinguished personalities, including Mr. BhimiReddy Kasi Reddy, Managing Director of Alphamed Formulations Pvt. Ltd., Telangana.

KL Memorial Moot court Concludes

The Octa-Final rounds witnessed 32 esteemed judges assessing the teams’ performances. Eight teams advanced to the Quarter-Finals, and after further scrutiny, four teams qualified for the Semi-Finals. The finalists were chosen after a rigorous evaluation by four judges.

Reflecting on the event, Dr. G. Pardha Saradhi Varma, Vice Chancellor of KL Deemed to be University, remarked, “The Koneru Laxmaiah Memorial National Moot Court Competition holds special significance as it provides a platform for our students to showcase their intellectual rigor and legal acumen. KL University is deeply committed to nurturing the next generation of legal professionals by challenging them to refine their analytical thinking and advocacy skills. This competition not only celebrates legal excellence but also fosters a spirit of collaboration and innovation among budding legal minds from across the nation.”

The grand Final Round, held in the KL Deemed to be University campus was presided over by two sitting Hon’ble Judges from the High Court of Andhra Pradesh Judicature at Amaravathi: Hon’ble Justice Sri K. Suresh Reddy and Hon’ble Justice Sri Dr. V.R.K. Krupa Sagar. After an intense session of legal arguments, the winners and runners-up were declared, with accolades presented for Best Researcher, Best Oral Presenter, and Best Memorial.

The event concluded with a grand award ceremony where the winners were celebrated. The winners of the competition were from Saveetha School of Law, SIMATS, while the runners-up hailed from Bharati Vidyapeeth (Deemed to be University), New Law College, Pune. The award for Best Researcher went to Kevin Joel Thomas from Saveetha School of Law, while Prity Sinha and Sanan Versha Sharma from Dr. B.R. Ambedkar National Law University, Sonipat, were recognized for the Best Memorial among other winners in different categories.

Hon’ble Pro Vice-Chancellor Dr. N. Venkram, Dr. M. Kishore Babu, Dean of MHS, Dr. Hari Kiran Vege, Additional Dean Academics, along with other dignitaries, faculty members, and students, attended the event. The competition was meticulously organized by Mr. Mudassir Rasool Wani, Assistant Professor and Convenor, along with various student committees under the guidance of Dr. K.I. Pavan Kumar, Principal of KL College of Law. The event received unanimous praise for its seamless execution and outstanding performances from all participating teams.

8 High Courts of the country will get new Chief Justices, Supreme Court Collegium recommends; See the list

Justice Tashi Rabstan, a judge of the Jammu and Kashmir High Court, has been recommended to be the Chief Justice of the Meghalaya High Court. The current Chief Justice Vaidyanathan is retiring on August 16.

The Supreme Court Collegium has recommended the appointment of new Chief Justices in 8 different High Courts of the country. The Collegium headed by Chief Justice DY Chandrachud has recommended the names of Chief Justices for Delhi, Jharkhand, Himachal Pradesh, Jammu and Kashmir and Ladakh, Madhya Pradesh, Kerala, Meghalaya and Madras High Courts. The way for their appointment will be cleared as soon as the approval is received from the central government.

– Advertisement –

The resolution was passed by the collegium comprising Chief Justice of India DY Chandrachud, Justice Sanjiv Khanna and Justice BR Gavai.

These 8 High Courts will get Chief Justices

According to the report of Live Law, Justice Manmohan has been proposed to be made the Chief Justice of Delhi High Court. He is currently the Acting Chief Justice of Delhi High Court.

Also Read: IMD Rainfall High Alert! There will be heavy rain in UP for the next 5 days, 15 states are going to get drenched

Justice M S Ramachandra Rao is proposed to be transferred as Chief Justice of Jharkhand High Court upon retirement of the present Chief Justice Dr B R Sarangi on 19.7.2024. He is presently the Chief Justice of Himachal Pradesh High Court.

Delhi High Court judge Justice Rajiv Shakdhar has been recommended to be made the Chief Justice of Himachal Pradesh High Court.

Another judge of the Delhi High Court, Justice Suresh Kait, has been recommended as the Chief Justice of Jammu and Kashmir and Ladakh High Court.

Justice Gurmeet Singh Sandhawalia, judge of the Punjab and Haryana High Court, has been recommended as the Chief Justice of Madhya Pradesh High Court.

Bombay High Court judge Justice Nitin Jamdar has been recommended by the Collegium to be appointed as the Chief Justice of Kerala High Court.

Justice Tashi Rabstan, a judge of the Jammu and Kashmir High Court, has been recommended to be the Chief Justice of the Meghalaya High Court. The current Chief Justice Vaidyanathan is retiring on August 16.

Justice K R Sriram has been recommended to be the Chief Justice of Madras High Court. He is currently working as a judge of the Bombay High Court.

ration card aadhar link kaise kare | ration card aadhar link | राशन कार्ड आधार कार्ड लिंक करना

– Advertisement –

Byju’s Challenges NCLT Order in High Court Amid Financial Crisis

Key investors move NCLT against Byju's rights issue, firm says yet to get any petition

IANS

In a current improvement, Byju’s, a number one edtech firm, has approached the Karnataka High Court, difficult the order of the National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT). The NCLT had beforehand restrained the corporate from continuing with its second rights concern, a transfer that has stirred up appreciable controversy. The second rights concern, which started on May 13, was anticipated to conclude on June 13. However, the NCLT’s intervention has put a halt to those plans.

The NCLT’s order has additionally prohibited Byju’s from using any funds raised from the second rights concern. This determination has come at a time when the corporate is grappling with a number of challenges, each in India and the US, towards its subsidiary. Amid these authorized battles and a extreme money crunch, Byju’s is exploring out-of-court settlements with two of its collectors, Teleperformance and Surfer Technologies.

The firm’s plea in the Karnataka High Court is predicted to be heard on Monday, in accordance with sources near the matter. This comes after the NCLT adjourned the circumstances to June 26.

karnataka high court

Financial Woes and Legal Battles

The NCLT’s order has mandated that the established order relating to current shareholders and their shareholding be maintained till the principle petition is disposed of. Byju’s has additionally been directed to file full particulars of the involved escrow financial institution accounts from the opening of the appropriate concern on January 29 until date inside ten days from June 12.

The firm’s monetary well being has taken a major hit as a consequence of these ongoing authorized battles and monetary troubles. Once valued at a staggering $22 billion, Byju’s is now value zero, in accordance with a current analysis notice by monetary agency HSBC. The notice acknowledged, We assign zero worth to Byju’s stake amid a number of authorized circumstances and funding crunch.” HSBC additionally assigned zero worth to funding firm Prosus’ almost 10 per cent stake (or about $500 million) in Byju’s.

Earlier this month, a gaggle of lenders petitioned towards new entities tied to Byju’s US subsidiary in a US courtroom, alleging that these entities weren’t paying their money owed. This follows Byju’s Alpha’s submitting for Chapter 11 chapter safety in the US in February 2024.

Comparisons and Consequences

Despite these challenges, the corporate managed to course of the worker salaries for May from month-to-month “collections”. The lenders additional acknowledged that as a consequence of Byju’s failed management and mismanagement, important hurt has been carried out to the corporate’s companies and the worth of the corporate’s belongings. The embattled edtech agency is struggling to pay worker salaries amid these mounting authorized battles.

This state of affairs is harking back to the monetary troubles confronted by different tech firms in the previous. For occasion, the downfall of the once-promising startup Theranos, which was valued at $9 billion earlier than its value plummeted to zero amid authorized and monetary troubles. Similarly, the Indian startup Snapdeal additionally confronted a extreme money crunch in 2017, resulting in layoffs and downscaling of operations.

In conclusion, Byju’s present predicament underscores the significance of sound monetary administration and the perils of fast enlargement with no strong monetary basis. The firm’s future now hinges on the end result of its plea in the Karnataka High Court and its capability to navigate by way of its present monetary and authorized challenges. The unfolding of those occasions will likely be intently watched by stakeholders and the edtech business at massive.

Swiss court finds Hindujas guilty of exploiting Indian staff; UK’s wealthiest family sentenced to jail

A court in Switzerland has discovered a number of members of the Hinduja family guilty of exploiting their Indian staff at their Geneva villa. The wealthiest family within the United Kingdom, with a reported internet value of USD 20 billion, now faces jail time period stretching a number of years.

Prakash Hinduja, Chairman Europe, Hinduja Group, Switzerland. Photo courtesy: Richter Frank-Jurgen/Wikipedia
Prakash Hinduja, Chairman Europe, Hinduja Group, Switzerland. Photo courtesy: Richter Frank-Jurgen/Wikipedia

A choose discovered 4 members of the family guilty of unlawful employment on Friday. However, the choice has been challenged in the next court.

As per experiences, the Swiss choose known as the Hindujas “egocentric” after listening to the case. Prosecutors alleged the family handled the workers inhumanly. The victims have been paid a paltry sum of USD 8 for 18 hours of work daily. This is lower than 1/10 of the sum assured to staff by Swiss regulation.

Reading out the sentence, the choose ordered four-year and 6 months’ jail time period for Prakash Hinduja and his spouse Kamal Hinduja. Their son Ajay and daughter-in-law Namrata obtained four-year phrases every. The court heard that the family additionally took away the passports of their employees and rarely allowed them outdoors their villa, positioned within the rich neighbourhood of Cologny.

However, the choose acquitted them of human trafficking fees.

The Hindujas run companies in 38 nations, starting from oil and gasoline to banking and healthcare.

Prosecutors instructed the court that the Hindujas spent extra on their pet canine than on their home assist.

Meanwhile, the family has denied the allegations and acknowledged they have been “appalled” by the decision and have filed a problem in the next court.

“We are appalled and upset by the remainder of the choice made on this court of first occasion, and we have now of course filed an attraction to the upper court thereby making this half of the judgment not efficient,” mentioned a press release signed by the legal professionals of the Hindujas, as reported by NDTV.

Reports acknowledged that the family had earlier reached an out-of-court settlement with the three staff, however the prosecution went forward with it due to the gravity of the fees.

While Prakash and Kamal Hinduja didn’t attend the court, Ajay and Namrata attended the trial. None of the family members, nevertheless, have been current on Friday to hear the decision.

Bihar Teacher Recruitment: High Court puts a stay on Bihar teacher recruitment TRE 3, what did the order say?

A giant information is popping out from the Bihar teacher recruitment examination presently. Patna High Court has put a stay on the BPSC Bihar teacher recruitment examination TRE 3 for now. It is noteworthy that BPSC had introduced recruitment for a whole of 87722 posts in TRE 3.

– Advertisement –

For the first time, the examination was cancelled in March attributable to query paper leak. Now earlier than the re-exam, Patna High Court has put a stay. Apart from this, Patna High Court has additionally put a stay on the matter of giving weightage to visitor lecturers of Plus 2 colleges. The court docket has ordered to present 5 marks on the foundation of every 12 months and most 25 marks weightage on the foundation of 5 years.

The court docket has mentioned in its order that lecturers of backward and very backward departments are getting weightage. In the teacher recruitment of BPSC, they’re getting a weightage of 5 marks on the foundation of every 12 months. Both are lecturers and each do the work of educating. Guest lecturers of the training division also needs to get weightage.

Also Read: IndiGo introduces new function of seat choice for ladies travellers

It is value noting that the visitor lecturers had appealed to the Patna High Court on this regard, after which the court docket has ordered to present weightage to the visitor lecturers of the training division as properly. Let us inform you, a whole of 5.25 lakh candidates have stuffed the kind in TRE-3.

 

– Advertisement –

Traffic police issues court challan for violating these rules while driving, know full details

New Delhi. A lot of individuals throughout the nation together with the capital Delhi violate site visitors rules. Due to which, numerous individuals are challaned every single day by the site visitors police.

– Advertisement –

In this information, we’re telling you in response to the web site of Delhi Traffic Police, after violating which rules solely Court Challan is issued by the Traffic Police

Do not drive on footpaths and cycle tracks

In metro cities like Delhi, site visitors jams are widespread. In such a state of affairs, many drivers violate site visitors rules and drive their autos on footpaths or cycle tracks. By doing this, an individual violates rule 39(3)MVDR/177A of the Motor Vehicle Act (MVA). After which a Court Challan is issued by the site visitors police.

Violation of Stop Sign

Zebra crossing and cease signal are made close to the purple mild on the roads. Usually STOP is written in English. But many drivers violate this rule close to the purple mild. This is a violation below part 184 of the Motor Vehicle Act and a Court Challan might be issued by the Traffic Police.

Court challan even below 18 years of age

If against the law is dedicated on the street by an individual under 18 years of age, i.e. a juvenile, then the site visitors police takes motion below Motor Vehicle Act 199A and issues a court challan.

Also Read: E-Challan: How to test on-line pending challans in your car, step-by-step steerage

Driving outdated autos

If any particular person is discovered driving a diesel car older than 10 years and a petroleum car older than 15 years on the street, then it’s a violation below 39/192/207 MVA. In such a case, the site visitors police issues a court challan.

On leaping the purple mild

If any car ignores site visitors rules and jumps a purple mild, then the police can problem a court challan for violating 184 MVA. The site visitors police additionally issues a court challan below 184 MVA in case of wrongly overtaking autos.

Dangerous and fallacious driving

If any particular person is discovered driving dangerously on the street or driving within the fallacious route, then he’s discovered responsible of violating 184 MVA. After which the site visitors police can problem a court challan.

Do not drink alcohol and drive

While advising on protected driving, the police informs that one ought to by no means drive after consuming alcohol. But if an individual is discovered doing so, it’s a violation of 185 MVA. After which a court challan might be filed by the police.

How to check vehicle details || how to check vehicle insurance details #rightsofemployees

– Advertisement –

The High Court abolished the OBC status of 77 Muslim castes of West Bengal

Voting for the sixth section of Lok Sabha elections goes to be held on June 25 after which the final spherical of voting will probably be held on June 1.

– Advertisement –

In this fashion, a few week is left for the elections and earlier than that the dialogue about the necessary choice of the Calcutta High Court is intense. On Wednesday, the High Court abolished the OBC status of 77 Muslim castes in West Bengal. The High Court gave this necessary choice declaring the foundation of granting OBC status to those Muslim castes as unlawful. Out of these 77 castes, 42 got OBC status in 2010 by the then Left authorities. After this, the remaining castes had been added throughout the Mamata Banerjee authorities.

The courtroom mentioned in its choice that there must be a right away ban on these communities getting appointments below the OBC quota. Along with this, a aid information was additionally provided that no motion must be taken towards those that have now obtained jobs or admission below OBC quota. Although the choice of the High Court is an instance for different states of the nation, its electoral affect can be seen in Bengal. The inhabitants of Muslims in the state is about 30 p.c, who’ve affect in nearly the whole state.

Also Read: Reserve Bank of India will give a dividend of Rs 2.11 lakh crore to the Central Government

The 17 seats the place elections are held in the sixth and seventh phases have a sizeable Muslim inhabitants. In such a state of affairs, it might not be shocking if there’s a state of affairs of polarization in the elections. Rejecting the OBC status, the courtroom mentioned, ‘The courtroom is of the view that unsuitable standards had been adopted for granting OBC status to 77 Muslim castes. It can be suspected that an try was made to make use of these individuals as vote financial institution. The approach these individuals had been included in the OBC checklist, evidently they had been handled as vote banks.

Who filed the petition and what was the argument

The courtroom has given this order after a protracted listening to on the petition filed by three individuals. In these petitions, it was mentioned that many castes had been included in the OBC-A and OBC-B checklist with none financial and social research. This occurred after 2011, when Trinamool Congress got here to energy.

#loksabhaelection2024 || क्या वोटिंग वाले दिन कर्मचारियों को मिलती है पेड छुट्टी?  || #votersrights

– Advertisement –

Three Indian nationals accused of killing Khalistani leader Nijjar appear before Canadian court

Three Indians appear before court in Khalistani leader Nijjar murder case
Three Indians accused of killing Khalistani leader appear before court. Photo courtesy: IHIT web site

Three Indian nationals, who’re accused within the killing of Khalistani leader Hardeep Singh Nijjar, appeared before a Canadian court on Tuesday by way of video convention, media stories stated.

The accused are recognized as Karanpreet Singh, Kamalpreet Singh and Karan Brar.

They appeared individually by video in entrance of a packed Surrey provincial court room to acknowledge the costs of first-degree homicide and conspiring to commit homicide and to conform to have their instances adjourned to May 21 to provide them time to seek the advice of with their attorneys, Vancouver Sun reported.

The court granted the Crown prosecutor’s request for a no-contact order naming seven folks below a Canada Criminal Code part that bans the accused from speaking immediately or not directly with any of them, the newspaper reported.

Nijjar’s son Balraj Nijjar, 21, and Harjinder Nijjar, Mehtab Nijjar, Sarandeep Sehaj, Harsimranjeet Singh, Arshdeep Kapoor and Malkit Singh have been named within the order.

Their subsequent step could be to have their attorneys apply for bail, Surrey legal and immigration lawyer Affan Bajwa instructed Vancouver Sun.

Bajwa stated their probabilities of being launched on bail would rely on whether or not their attorneys might make a robust case to the choose.

“I feel it might be tough for them to be launched on bail as a result of of a attainable flight danger and danger to public security,” he stated.

Canadian Police Friday arrested the three members of an alleged gang linked to the homicide of the Khalistani leader.

Nijjar, 45, was shot useless in June final yr exterior a gurdwara in Surrey, a Vancouver suburb with a big Sikh inhabitants.

A number of months later, Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau alleged Indian authorities involvement, triggering a diplomatic disaster with New Delhi.

Three Indian nationals accused of killing Khalistani leader Nijjar appear before Canadian court

Three Indians appear before court in Khalistani leader Nijjar murder case
Three Indians accused of killing Khalistani leader appear before court. Photo courtesy: IHIT web site

Three Indian nationals, who’re accused within the killing of Khalistani leader Hardeep Singh Nijjar, appeared before a Canadian court on Tuesday by way of video convention, media stories mentioned.

The accused are recognized as Karanpreet Singh, Kamalpreet Singh and Karan Brar.

They appeared individually by video in entrance of a packed Surrey provincial court room to acknowledge the costs of first-degree homicide and conspiring to commit homicide and to comply with have their instances adjourned to May 21 to provide them time to seek the advice of with their attorneys, Vancouver Sun reported.

The court granted the Crown prosecutor’s request for a no-contact order naming seven folks beneath a Canada Criminal Code part that bans the accused from speaking straight or not directly with any of them, the newspaper reported.

Nijjar’s son Balraj Nijjar, 21, and Harjinder Nijjar, Mehtab Nijjar, Sarandeep Sehaj, Harsimranjeet Singh, Arshdeep Kapoor and Malkit Singh have been named within the order.

Their subsequent step can be to have their attorneys apply for bail, Surrey prison and immigration lawyer Affan Bajwa informed Vancouver Sun.

Bajwa mentioned their possibilities of being launched on bail would depend upon whether or not their attorneys may make a powerful case to the decide.

“I feel it could be troublesome for them to be launched on bail as a result of of a attainable flight threat and threat to public security,” he mentioned.

Canadian Police Friday arrested the three members of an alleged gang linked to the homicide of the Khalistani leader.

Nijjar, 45, was shot useless in June final 12 months outdoors a gurdwara in Surrey, a Vancouver suburb with a big Sikh inhabitants.

A couple of months later, Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau alleged Indian authorities involvement, triggering a diplomatic disaster with New Delhi.